|
|||||||
|
This Month
Month Archive
Login
BDD Store
BDD Recommends
Minor League/College Links
Projection Applications
Search
|
Wednesday, July 16
by
jkbrattain
on Wed 16 Jul 2008 03:00 PM EDT
Of bruised deceased equines, Barry Bonds, labor law and Godwin's law and thee. more »
Sunday, July 13
by
jkbrattain
on Sun 13 Jul 2008 05:26 PM EDT
The body is not yet cold.
A week ago I wrote "The Toronto Blue Jays are fatally flawed. I think it may be time to run up the white flag." Toronto was 14 games out and was finishing up what would be a miserable 2-4 west coast trip. Since then, the Jays swept the Orioles and took two of three from the Yankees while the Rays have lost seven straight. Now the Blue Jays are 8.5 back at the break. A.J. Burnett was masterful today on three days rest: 8.1 IP, 6 H, 1 ER 1 BB 8 K on less than 100 pitches--it was the sort of completely unexpected effort that gives fans hope that better days are ahead; all the more so since Roy Halladay was even better on Friday (9 IP, 2 H, 0 ER 0 BB 8 K ). Yes, despite taking two of three from the Yankees the Jays did all their scoring in the first two innings over the weekend with four runs in the first inning on Saturday and four in the second frame today before reverting to their usual getting men into scoring position and leaving them there the rest of the way. Still, it’s a better outcome than I thought would happen this weekend. I figured after Halladay, since Gaston’s initial plan of having Jesse Litsch go Saturday and lefty reliever Brian Tallet on Sunday (in what would be a Charlie Wholestaff game) would mean two losses. After all, Litsch hasn’t been pitching well of late and the Bronx Bombers always hit him hard and the Wholestaff game versus Andy Pettitte looked to be a foregone conclusion. I had guessed that Cito figured with Litsch starting, Saturday would be the game where the bullpen would be needed for a lot of innings and opted to see what Burnett could do on three days rest. Well, Litsch delivered as expected and couldn’t hold a three-run cushion for 30 pitches (although he did throw the inning ending pitch that was booted by Marcos Scutaro) and A.J. did the unexpected and probably made his best start of 2008. The Jays are 12-9 under Gaston and are so despite the struggles of Litsch (1-5, 5.56 ERA over his last eight starts), Dustin McGowan (1-3, 5.81 ERA over his final five starts before being shelved) and Burnett (4-3, 6.91 ERA over his previous seven starts prior to today), not having Shaun Marcum available, Vernon Wells getting hurt recently, Alex Rios away for the series (to be with his wife during delivery), Scott Rolen batting .111/.238/.139 in July (before today), Gregg Zaun hitting .087/.250/.087 over the previous nine games, Rod Barajas doing no better (.167/.167/.333) over his last nine, Matt Stairs batting .205/.333/.325 since mid May and of course not having Aaron Hill. Still, the Jays have gotten it done. Amazing. It’s still a longshot to think the Jays will be in it come September but Adam Lind is hitting well since his recall (.350/.369/.633), Alex Rios is .338/.370/.506 since Cito took over the Jays, Joe Inglett .339/.383/.482 likewise, have hit into just nine double plays over their last 15 games and there’s a player on the market (or soon to be) who hit .260/.363/.512 on the road and kills lefties .344/.423/.623 this year. He's hitting .350/.435/.500 in Toronto this year and is a career .316/.397/.565 hitter at the Dome and he‘d cost the pro-rated minimum. I speak of course of Richie Sexson. He’s not the saviour to be sure but he’d be a very useful bat and a source of pop--especially against lefties of whom the Jays are batting just .244/.323/.335 this year. Considering he costs chump change and a roster spot (such as Kevin Mench or Brad Wilkerson’s cadaverric .182/.325/.212 the last month) it strikes me as a no-brainer--he’d be the team leader in home runs right from the get-go. At the very least, the post All Star break will quickly settle whether the Jays will be buyers or sellers at the trade deadline--they cannot ask for a better schedule to get back into things: they have four against the Orioles, three against the Mariners and six against the Rays. If they go 9-4 with at least four wins against the Rays (preferably five) and I think they have a half-decent shot. In the “dare to dream” department--two sweeps could conceivably have them within three games of the Rays with the Red Sox in their sights as well. I said it was a dream. One week ago I was ready to officially run up the white flag--well, the Jays have been given an extension until the end of July before I start looking to 2009 in earnest. Best Regards John P.S. Free Wayne McMahon!! Follow the links and read up to the saga of a Rogers Centre institution. Thanks to the good folks at Drunk Jays Fans word is getting out about the firing of a legendary suds-salesman. If you’re at the Dome raise a cheer and show your support in getting Wayne his job back. All you have to yell is: ICE. COLD. BEEEEEEEERRR!!! Saturday, July 5
by
jkbrattain
on Sat 05 Jul 2008 12:30 PM EDT
The Toronto Blue Jays are fatally flawed. I think it may be time to run up the white flag. Here's the thing, it's pretty common knowledge that the offense struggles in big moments. We documented yesterday how the 2008 Blue Jays' hitters struggle once a runner reaches third base: Team BA OBP SLG 2B 3B HR BBJust for fun, earlier this week on The Hardball Times I charted Dave Winfield’s totals with (at least) runners on third in 1992: Sit. BA OBP SLG(sigh) But I digress. I went through the box scores to see how many times the Jays hit below the “Mendoza Line” with RISP this year and in 87 games, they hit less than .200 in 39 of them including 13 0-fers. They are 12-21 in one run games, 18-28 in two run games and at home, they are 0-5 in extra innings. Speaking of which--in 14 extra innings at the Rogers Centre, the Jays are batting .278. However, with RISP in drops to .105 and when they’ve had RISP and less than two out they’re hitting .111 and have stranded 21 base runners. It has been too long to be considered a fluke and even if it is and they rebound, the team has yet another fatal flaw in the clutch--relief pitching. In my weekly MSN Canada column I discussed how, despite a solid ERA, the Jays’ bullpen loses it when things get tough. For example, here is the bullpen’s line at home in extra innings: W-L ERA IP ER H BB K WHIPSo the hitters haven’t been the only problem in extras. Now before you go all sample size on me, rest assured, this is only the tip of the iceberg and there’s a lot more data to come. The game has evolved in that the starting pitcher’s role has simply become to keep his team in the game through at least six innings. In this regard, the Jays’ starting staff has held up its end of the bargain. It’s up to the bats and the bullpen to bring the game home. For the most part, the relievers’ job begins in the 7-8th innings. Since we’re talking about clutch ability among the bullpen, let’s see how the Jays’ staff stacks up in tie games in the late innings--when they’re needed most: Team W-L ERA T7 T8 T9The 3.12 ERA, as I documented on MSN, hasn’t been really useful. How do they stack up against the rest of the AL? Team W-L ERA T7 T8 T9Take out the ERA component and the team most resembling the Blue Jays are the Indians who definitely have the worst bullpen in MLB. Team W-L T7 T8 T9Is this another statistical fluke, a simple random variation or an anomaly? If it is--then that’s two flukes working against the Jays. What are the odds that a team with an upper-echelon bullpen (insofar as ERA goes) and a slightly worse than league average OPS+ (the Angels have a far worse OPS+) can so vastly underachieve in not just one, but two major clutch categories? Maybe it’s not an anomaly at all and simply a poorly constructed team that is far worse than the sum of its parts. If you were too look at the players on an individual basis it would be easy to conclude that’s it is a competitive club. However, as a collective unit they’re simply not up to the task. Here is a team that the raw numbers informs us is two BB out of second place in the AL in walks drawn, second in relief ERA and fifth in starter’s ERA (3.75) and not far from second place in the league (Angels: 3.62 ERA) but has the 11th best record in a 14 team league. The Jays have won 23 of their 41 games by three or more runs, but when the game gets close the Jays generally come up short: 12-21 in one-run games, 18-28 in two run (or less) games, 3-7 in extra innings (0-5 at the Rogers Centre). Again, the starting pitching has done its job but they’re rarely around in the crucial late innings. Once the starters are gone and the clutch situations that often decide games arise, the Jays’ roster shows its true colours. Yes, some of it is certainly on the players but it’s up to the organization to create an environment where the players can succeed. Clearly there is an expectation of failure that has crept into the club that manifests itself time and again. You won’t find it in the numbers (save the standings) but you’ll see it on the field. That falls to the club’s architect--J.P. Ricciardi. Best Regards John Friday, July 4
by
jkbrattain
on Fri 04 Jul 2008 06:21 PM EDT
The Jays are giving the AL a primer on how to suck.
The Mariners have had 348 PA with (at least) a man on third and are batting .272/.369/.356 and despite almost 70 fewer PA they have six more hit with two more for extra bases. The Royals have had 319 PA with (at least) a man on third and are hitting .311/.384/.422 with 20 extra base hits despite almost 100 fewer PA. The Angels, like the Mariners, have had 348 PA with (at least) a man on third and are batting .295/.400/.421 with 27 extra base hits (8 HR). These are the four lowest scoring teams in the AL (11. Royals, 12. Blue Jays, 13. Angels, 14. Mariners)--even among the lightweights of the AL the Jays offense in clutch situations is abysmal. Team BA OBP SLG 2B 3B HR BBDavid Eckstein is on the trading block and with men on third he’s hitting .308/.379/.384--absent the X-Factor, the team is batting .197/.324/.298 in that situation. Dear God, if they deal Eckstein we may see a team intentionally load the bases in the ninth inning with nobody out and a one-run lead to better their chances of closing out the game. Don’t you wish you could make them go stand in the corner or something? I think Paul Godfrey might be missing out on a classic marketing opportunity--"This Blue Jays’ man on third situation is brought to you by Depends. For those times when you know you’re about to wet yourself in public." "If I hit like that--I’d wear a dress."--Mickey Mantle Well, at least J.P. Ricciardi is giving Jays’ fans a taste of what being a Leafs fan feels like. Best Regards John Thursday, July 3
by
jkbrattain
on Thu 03 Jul 2008 12:00 PM EDT
I am convinced that Bud Selig ran the Montreal Expos better than J.P. Ricciardi is running the Blue Jays. Yup...after a burst of optimistic posts, cruel reality insists on intruding again. Tuesday, July 1
by
jkbrattain
on Tue 01 Jul 2008 03:46 PM EDT
|
||||||

